Planning
Dr. Allison Rossett wrote in her book Beyond the Podium: Delivering Training and Performance to a Digital World, “Outcome-oriented, [great training] is authentic and active. Afterwards, you know you’ve been involved with something compelling, vivid and memorable – something you can take back to your work and life.” [1] Substitute great training for great lectures, great demonstrations, or even great webinars and you can see that there are commonalities between all presentation formats. Furthermore, these commonalities help to illuminate a strategy for engagement in the planning of any sort of presentation, which in this case, happens to be a webinar.
Engage Us, Don’t Enrage Us
In formulating a plan for success, we have to define the common failures of poor presentations so as to avoid those pitfalls. We also need to model our design strategies after the benchmark for good presentations. This list is by no means exhaustive, but covers some of the most commonly shared complaints of both eMeetings and face-to-face presentations alike.
| WHAT WE NEED | WHAT ENRAGES US | WHAT ENGAGES US |
|---|---|---|
| Agenda: Tell us where we are going and how we'll get there | Poor/no objectives offered | Clear objectives and learning goals stated up front. |
| Planning: Show us that you put some thought into this | Disorganization and a lack of a game plan. | High level of organization, evident pre-planning, and an agenda right at the beginning. |
| Engagement: Don't make us feel like were all alone | Rote lecturing with no opportunities for dialogue | Meaningful points of engagement that allow participants to build a sense of community |
| Assessment: Know what I already know and what I need | Content not aligned to user needs or skill levels | Pre-assessments that allow presenters to specialize content offerings |
| Timing: Tell me how long it will take and then keep to that promise | Presentation runs over or offers no indication of where we're at in the lesson | Focused material presented at a good pace that leaves ample time for questions |
| Takeaway: Give me something to take away from the session | No plan for engagement or call to action post-session | Useful takeaway items, downloadable resources, and a place to continue the discussion afterwards |
Excellence = Access

Webinars have the ability to share content that serves as the tip of the iceberg, and then leaves students with a takeaway activity that promotes critical thinking and development of new ideas. [2] A successful webinar puts learners first, acknowledges that presentation and preparation are key, is well thought out and well articulated, and acknowledges the unique learning challenges and needs of the participants. In her article, “What Stinks About Most Webinars,” Dr. Allison Rossett cites personalization and engagement as essential, encouraging presenters to utilize “activities that compel attention rather than demand it.” [3] Ultimately, success cannot be claimed without assessment. A good presenter takes the time to reflect on the quality of instruction and uses feedback in order to improve teaching and the meeting of learning outcomes.
A skilled presenter takes the time to know what their participants want and then capitalizes upon this learner motivation. In the next module, we will show you how to complete an audience assessment that will help you to align personal learner goals to overarching learning objectives.
- Rossett, A., & Sheldon, K. (2001). Beyond the podium: Delivering training and performance to a digital world. (1st ed.). San Francisco: Josey-Bass/Pfeiffer.↑
- Azer, S. A. (2009). What makes a great lecture? Use of lectures in hybrid pbl curriculum. The kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 25(3), 109-115. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X0970049X↑
- Rossett, A., Chan, A., & Cunningham, C. (2008, July 30). What stinks about webinars. Retrieved from http://clomedia.com/articles/view/what_stinks_about_webinars/↑